hamburger

127th Constitutional Amendment Bill: Effects, Response, Significance

By Balaji

Updated on: February 23rd, 2023

The Government brought the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill that aims to clarify some of the provisions in the 102nd constitutional amendment bill and restore the power of the states and the union territories to identify and list the socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs).

In Lok Sabha, 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill was started by Dr. Virendra Kumar, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, on August 9, 2021. This article will provide complete information on 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill, its response, significance, and effects.

Table of content

(more)
  • 1. What is 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill? (more)
  • 2. Why was the 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill Necessary? (more)
  • 3. Changes Mandated By the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill (more)
  • 4. Significance of 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill (more)
  • 5. Response of leaders to the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill (more)
  • 6. OBC Bill 2021 – Key Highlights (more)
  • 7. Relevance of 127 Amendment of Indian Constitution (more)
  • 8. 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill – Effect on OBCs (more)

What is 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill?

127 Constitutional Amendment Bill provided the National Commission for Backward Classes a constitutional status. The bill gave the President of India authority to put any Union territory or state on the list of SEBC.

The OBC Bill 2021 was supposed to amend the following articles and present a new clause 3. Social and educationally backward classes were described under Articles 366 (26c).

  • Article 342A (clauses 1 and 2)
  • Articles 366 (26c)
  • Article 338B (9)

Since India has a parliamentary structure, it recently passed the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill in 2021 to strengthen the system even more. The transformation was required for society’s betterment.

Why was the 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill Necessary?

The 102nd Constitution Amendment Act passed in 2018 imparted constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Class (NCBC) and authorized the President to identify the communities to be included in the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) for any state or union territory.

  • It took away the power of the states to prepare the list.
  • About the Maratha reservation hearing, the Supreme Court ruled that, per the 102nd constitutional amendment act, the President, with recommendations from the NCBC, is empowered to determine the communities included in the SEBC list.
  • Until now, the states were responsible for identifying the communities included in the SEBCs.
  • The 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill was introduced by the Government to restore the power of the states.
  • The bill asserted that the President could identify the list of socially and educationally backward classes only for the central Government.
  • The 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill also enabled various states and union territories to identify the socially and educationally backward class communities and prepare their list.
  • This list may or may not differ from the central list.
  • For illustration, if all the state lists were nullified, around 671 OBC communities would have failed the privilege of reservations in appointments, educational institutions, and promotions.
  • Approximately 20% of OBC populations in India would have been highly affected.
  • It clearly described that the State has the power to make reservations for communities, including all matters within the limit of Articles 15 and 16. The only restriction they faced was identifying the SEBCs.

Changes Mandated By the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill

The following changes to the constitution took place after the 127 Amendment of Indian Constitution came into effect:

  • It amended clauses 1 and 2 of Article 342A and introduced a new clause 3, which states that the states and the union territories can maintain their list of SEBCs as was the norm.
  • The bill also amended Article 338B of the Constitution. As per article 338B, the central and State governments need to consult the NCBC on all policy matters concerning the socially and educationally backward classes.
  • However, the amendment in 338B brought about by the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill exempts the states and union territories from this when preparing their list of socially and educationally backward classes.
  • The bill has also amended articles 366, which defines socially and educationally backward classes.

Significance of 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill

The 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill is important because it has removed ambiguity in the standard functioning of the SEBCs reservation.

  • It allows state governments and union territories to add communities to the SEBC list as per their preference.
  • Furthermore, it reinforces the position of NCBC by directing the center, states, and union territories to consult this constitutional body in matters related to SEBCs.

Reservations were given to the oppressed by our lawmakers and were expected to remove the social divide and ensure social equality.

  • However, even after 75 years of independence, social hierarchies have hardly changed in India.
  • A huge gap still needs to be bridged by revisiting the strategies devised till now.
  • The 127 Constitutional Amendment Bill is a step in this direction.

Response of leaders to the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill

The opposition leaders of the 127th Constitution Amendment Bill also supported the changes wholeheartedly. During discussions of passing the Bill, opposition leaders joked about the successful legislation of the Bill for the community polls in Uttar Pradesh, as OBCs are known to play an important role in voter turnout.

Political Leader Reaction to 127 Amendment of Indian Constitution
Mallikarjun Kharge, Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha. Stated that all opposition parties supported the amendment. However, the INC pointed out that many states want 50 percent reservation.
Adhir Ranjan Chowdhary, Lead speaker for the Opposition in the Lok Sabha. There was a need for the bill because the ruling Government had not paid attention to the Opposition’s proposals during the 102nd Constitutional Amendment, 2018.
Supriya Sule, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader. The recognition goes to the Maharashtra government, which asked the Centre to force the Bill for the present issue.
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), MP Dayanidhi He hoped the UP elections arrive every year as only they think about the interests of the backward citizens.
Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMIM chief. Questioned the Government for playing vote-bank politics and why they supported a few backward categories.

He requested that the 1950 Presidential order offering reservations to Scheduled castes should offer equal rights to Muslims and not be based on religion.

Akhilesh Yadav, Samajwadi Party leader. Declared the Centre’s commitment to social justice and blamed the government for playing with the reservation strategy to increase their benefit.

He pointed out Government’s anti-reservation view showing a 50% cap on reservations.

OBC Bill 2021 – Key Highlights

The new OBC Bill 2021 was passed by the Parliament to modify the Constitution to assist states’ governments in recognizing excluded or disadvantaged communities more effectively.

  • The Parliament approved it without any opposition, and there was no vote against OBC Bill 2021.
  • The bill focuses on elucidating particular elements of the 102 Amendment Act of Indian Constitution that allow States and Union Territories to make their distinct socially and educationally underprivileged groups list.
  • According to the 127 Amendment of Indian Constitution, the president’s control over the state list would be entirely withdrawn, and the state legislature will be informed.
  • After being renumbered, the bill should be considered the 105 Constitutional Amendment Act.

Relevance of 127 Amendment of Indian Constitution

There has been significant relevance of the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill in history. It aimed to help 671 OBC groups in the country. It was estimated that approximately 1/5th of the total OBC communities would get the benefits.

  • The bill restored the powers of the States to maintain a special list of OBCs, removed by the Supreme Court’s justice.
  • OBC Bill 2021 is supposed to allow governments to reply fast to the needs of socioeconomic matters essential for a specific region or State.

127 Constitutional Amendment Bill – Effect on OBCs

Some members of Parliament presented the matter defining Creamy Layer during the session of Parliament. Listed were the developments of OBCs that took place under the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill.

  • The Justice Rohini committee was responsible for sub-categorizing the OBC quota.
  • If any specific community or group is profiting more from this quota, they have to manage to remove such irregularities.

The following was the percentage of reservations granted by the Union Health Ministry in the All India Quota (AIQ) scheme for undergraduate and postgraduate dental/medical courses between 2021-22.

  • 27% reservation for the (OBCs) or Other Backward Classes.
  • 10% quota for the (EWS) or Economically Weaker Sections.
UPSC Notes
123rd Constitutional Amendment 105 Constitutional Amendment Act
Constitutional Amendment Bill 42 Amendment of Indian Constitution
Important Amendments of Indian Constitution 101 Constitutional Amendment Act
102 Amendment Act of Indian Constitution 104 Amendment of Indian Constitution
Our Apps Playstore
POPULAR EXAMS
GOVT. EXAMS
STATE EXAMS
GradeStack Learning Pvt. Ltd.Windsor IT Park, Tower - A, 2nd Floor, Sector 125, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303 help@byjusexamprep.com
Home Practice Test Series Premium