What do you mean by moral reasons?

Moral reasoning studies how individuals form and uphold moral principles and their conceptions of right and evil. It is the cornerstone of descriptive ethics and a branch of moral psychology that intersects with moral philosophy.

Are prudential reasons and moral reasons the same?

They aren’t the same. In contrast to moral reason, which asserts that power sharing is at the heart of democracy, prudential reason states that it prevents conflicts between various types of administration .

Home/
IAS/
Article

What is the Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing?

Q: What is the Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing?

The Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing is: Prudential power sharing is used for resolving conflicts between various governmental structures, whereas moral power sharing is used for the distribution of authority democratically. What is the Difference between the 73rd and 74th Amendments Act? What is the Difference between the Negative and Positive Conception of Liberty?

By BYJU'S Exam Prep

Updated on: September 11th, 2023

The difference between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing is that prudential power sharing is used for resolving conflicts, while Moral reasons are based on moral considerations. Prudential Reasons depend on careful calculation of losses and gains. Whereas the distribution of moral power is democratically the allocation of authority.

Table of content

1. Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing
2. Power Sharing

Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing

Moral reasons for power sharing claim that power sharing is beneficial. In this, people can object to how they will be governed. Under Prudential reasons, Power is shared among different levels of Government.

The Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing is as follows:

Prudential Power Sharing	Moral Power Sharing
It is based on a rigorous analysis of gains and losses.	It is founded on moral principles.
It claims to produce superior results.	It is a vital element of democracy.
Both little and significant communities suffer because of it, which damages national unity.	It is not based on the calculation of loss or profit due to decentralization.
It is based on a comprehensive analysis of profit and loss. However, the distribution of moral power is democratically the distribution of authority.	It is based on moral principles.
An example is the reservation of seats for women and minorities in India.	An example is India’s decentralization of authority.

Power Sharing

Power is divided between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Additionally, it can be shared between governments in different organizations, such as national and federal governments.

Social groups can also transmit power, including linguistic and religious.
Power can also be distributed among various levels, including local, state, and federal.

Related Questions:

What is the Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing?

Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing

Power Sharing

FAQs on Difference Between Prudential and Moral Reasons for Power Sharing