Ilbert Bill Controversy: Objectives, Introduced By | Ilbert Bill UPSC

By BYJU'S Exam Prep

Updated on: November 14th, 2023

The Ilbert Bill Controversy (1883) has taken on a special significance in British India’s legal, constitutional, and political past. The Ilbert Bill was introduced in 1883 by Viceroy Ripon, who genuinely wanted the Indian Penal Code’s racial discrimination removed. To provide Indian judges and magistrates the authority to try British offenders in criminal cases at the District level, Ripon had advocated amending the country’s current laws. The Ilbert Bill was written by Sir Courtenay Pergine Ilbert. The European expatriates in India saw it as a humiliation, and the bill’s presentation was met with vehement opposition both in Britain and India.

The article here discusses various aspects of the Ilbert Bill, along with the background to the Ilbert Bill Controversy. The topic is extremely important from the UPSC Prelims and UPSC Mains perspective.

Ilbert Bill

Before the adoption of the Ilbert Bill, British citizens were free from Indian magistrates’ courtroom proceedings in 1873. The only court that could hear cases involving death or transportation was a higher court. With the introduction of the Ilbert Bill in 1883, this situation was altered.

The bill’s provisions specified that going forward, Indian judges who were senior enough in the civil service to rule over such procedures would try British and European subjects in session courts. This clause caused a significant deal of resentment among the European community.

  • The Ilbert Bill was titled to honour Courtenay Peregrine Ilbert, a legal advisor to the Council of India.
  • The Bill, which Viceroy Ripon instituted in 1883, sought to abolish racial prejudice in the Indian Penal system.

Ilbert Bill Controversy

The Ilbert Bill stated that British and European subjects could be tried in session court by senior Indian judges. The rationale behind this decision was to lower the pressure on British judges; until then, only a British judge could preside over any cases involving a British person.

Given the deep-rooted racial ideology of the time, the Bill created a huge controversy. Moreover, since India at that time was a dominion of the British Crown, European and British settlers felt the Bill humiliated them and thus opposed it vehemently.

  • The law sparked vehement opposition from the European commercial community in Calcutta, which also included tea and indigo planters.
  • Even clandestine support came from several officials.
  • Deep-seated racial stereotypes that were widespread at the time were the foundation of the dispute.
  • The advertising that claimed Indian judges couldn’t be trusted to handle cases involving English women contributed significantly to the law’s opponents.

Ilbert Bill (1883): Resolution to the Conflict

Viceroy Ripon was compelled to approve an amendment in its new form in January 1884 as a result of the widespread public opposition to the law among the British population, particularly among women. The modified Ilbert Bill stipulated that a European, whether European or Indian, who was brought to trial before a judge, would have the right to request a jury trial with twelve members, at least seven of whom had to be Europeans or Americans. Thus, the spirit and utility of the original bill were lost in the revised version.

The Ilbert Bill Controversy thus ended with the newly amended legislation being approved on January 25th, 1884, and it became operative on May 1st of the same year. The Criminal Procedure Code Amendment Act, 1884, was enacted due to the revised Ilbert Bill. The compromise and the debate that followed exacerbated the hostility between the British and Indians.

The Indians learned two valuable lessons from the Ilbert Bill Controversy, namely:

  • The English did not want to grant the Indians equal status since they saw them as belonging to a lower race.
  • The Indians gained knowledge of the strategies for organising a movement and the potency of a coordinated protest. Both supported them in their fight against the British as a country.

Aftermath of the Ilbert Bill Controversy

In addition to unrest among the British population living in India, the Ilbert Bill had miffed even British officials, who had covert sympathy and support since they, too, did not like the idea of Indian judges getting the power to try Europeans, who, according to them, was superior.

  • English women also opposed the Bill, arguing that Bengali women, who they deemed ignorant, should not have any say in cases that involved women from England.
  • This statement was opposed by Bengali women who supported the Ilbert Bill and responded by pointing out how the number of educated Bengali women was more than the number of educated English women.
  • They also noted that more Indian women had gone through college-level education than British women. The University of Calcutta in 1878 was the first to allow female graduates to pursue degree programs, well before any British university.

First Woman Graduate from Calcutta

However, the compromise and the ensuing Ilbert Bill Controversy profoundly impacted the Indian-educated middle class, who saw themselves as equal to the British. The discontent led to a new stage in the Indian freedom struggle, and later the Indian National Congress would be formed in 1885.

Ilbert Bill UPSC

The topic of Ilbert Bill Controversy is an important topic in the modern history section of the UPSC Syllabus, relevant for the UPSC Exam. To know more about the topic, refer to the NCERT Books for UPSC.

Ilbert Bill Controversy UPSC Questions

Question: The European Organization in India which launched an agitation against the Ilbert Bill Controversy was:

  1. European Defence Association
  2. Indo-British Association
  3. Anti-Ilbert Bill League
  4. European Rights Front

Answer: Option A

Question: Ilbert Bill was related to

  1. Press
  2. Education
  3. Judiciary
  4. Executive expansion

Answer: Option C

Our Apps Playstore
SSC and Bank
Other Exams
GradeStack Learning Pvt. Ltd.Windsor IT Park, Tower - A, 2nd Floor, Sector 125, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303
Home Practice Test Series Premium