De Facto Vs De Jure - Meaning, Definition

By K Balaji|Updated : October 29th, 2022

The points highlighting the De Facto Vs De Jure are that the former describes methods that exist in reality, even though regulations do not officially acknowledge them, whereas De Jure defines legally recognized traditions, regardless of whether they exist. Another striking difference elucidating the points of De Facto vs De Jure is that the former is renowned as factual recognition while the latter has its name as legal recognition.

The facts of the De facto Vs De Jure are based on government that while De Facto recognition would be maintaining two rival governments, De Jure recognition would have only one government. Walk through the article below to learn more about the points highlighting the De Facto Vs De Jure. The aspirants preparing for UPSC exam must be well-versed in the complete details of the differences, meanings and definitions of both terms to attain good grades in the exam.

Difference between De Facto and De Jure

Understanding the points highlighting the De Facto Vs De Jure is significant from the UPSC examination point of view. Both legal terms describe the status of prominent positions held by the important stakeholders of the Indian Government. While De Facto refers to factual recognition, De Jure refers to legal recognition. To better understand the difference between De Facto and De Jure, take a look at the table below:

De Jure Vs De Facto

De Facto

De Jure

De Facto is commonly known as factual recognition.

De Jure is commonly known as legal recognition.

The State which has earned De Facto recognition would be maintaining two opposing governments.

The State that has obtained De Jure recognition has one government.

The recognition that is granted by De Facto is based on facts and is not a process of law.

De Jure is a recognition awarded after observing the law.

Diplomatic representatives are usually not transferred to other States, and neither is obtained in States under De Facto conditions.

Diplomatic representatives can be exchanged in De Jure circumstances.

State succession regulations are not suitable for De Facto recognition. This implies that the State cannot annex other states and levy succession regulations in case its own recognition is De Facto.

Under De Jure conditions, the regulations of State succession are functional and implemented in case of such a situation.

A De Facto government is in no standing to recover a public debt or State asset.

A De Jure government holds the position and power to recover a public debt or State asset.

An example of De Facto can be a learner's driving license.

An example of De Jure is a permanent license.

A De Facto distinction can be withdrawn at any time.

De Jure recognition cannot be removed at any level.

What is De Facto?

De Facto defines procedures or positions that exist in reality in any statute, rule, or government. Even though Indian regulations do not officially acknowledge them, they are existent. De Facto norms are standards in existence.

Difference between De Facto and De Jure PDF

These policies are adopted widely by the industry. The De Facto is renowned for factual recognition. The attainment of De Facto status by a State is solely based on facts and is not dependent on the process of law. The De facto cannot be taken back easily.

What is De Jure?

De Jure, on the other hand, defines procedures that the State lawfully acknowledges. This is regardless of whether the procedure exists in reality or not. The Government attaining the De Jure possesses the power to recover the State assets and public debts.

In addition, De Jure norms are standards according to regulation. A formal norms organization endorses these, and the organization authorizes each benchmark through its official policies and supports it.

Important Notes for UPSC
Appointment and Removal of Judges of Supreme CourtSupreme Court of India
West Flowing Rivers in IndiaRailway Protection Force
Money Supply in IndiaIUCN Red List

Comments

write a comment

FAQs on De Facto Vs De Jure

  • The major points that illustrate the De Facto Vs De Jure are that while the former describes methods that exist in reality, even though regulations do not officially acknowledge them, De Jure defines and legally recognizes traditions, regardless of whether they exist. An example of the Difference Between De Facto and De Jure is: a learner's driving license is a De Facto recognition, whereas a permanent license is a De Jure recognition.

  • The main point illustrating the De Jure Vs De Facto based on public assets is that a De Facto government is in no standing to recover a public debt or state asset. On the other hand, a De Jure government holds the position and power to recover a public debt or state asset.

  • The State which has attained De Facto recognition maintains two opposing governments. This is not a part of the process of law and is in accordance with the facts. De Facto is well-renowned as factual recognition. The distinction of the De facto can be taken back at any time. The Diplomatic representatives cannot be transferred or exchanged in case of De facto. The Government attaining the De facto does not possess the power of recovering the State asset or public debt.

  • The De Jure is renowned for legal recognition. The State attaining the De Jure status has only one Government. The law is the major perspective in deciding the De Jure status of a state. Diplomatic representatives are liable to get exchanged in De Jure status. The regulations acting on State succession are active and can get implemented in case of a situation. The De jure recognition can not be taken back.

Featured Articles

Follow us for latest updates