Time Left - 07:00 mins

Reading Comprehension quiz for SBI PO

Attempt now to get your rank among 571 students!

Question 1

Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world after Russia, according to a 2017 Oxfam report entitled “An economy for the 99%”. More sobering is the fact that even the people we might consider to be middle class in India are really quite poor.
According to a study by Pew Research Center, even though India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011, the population that could be considered middle income saw only a marginal increase, going from about 1% to just 3%. This means instead of a swelling middle class, India saw a movement of its population from poor to low-income earners (defined as between Rs 34 and Rs 170 per day per person, or Rs 170 to Rs 850 per day per family). The study pointed out that “these were people hovering closer to $2 than $10 in daily income, and thus still a ways from the transition to middle-income status.” At that income threshold, a large proportion of Indians are at the edge of the global poverty line, possibly only one economic or health shock away from slipping back into poverty.
Given the sheer size of the problem, it would be infeasible for India to address it through transfers of wealth from the tiny sliver of high- and middle-income people (3% of the population) to the poor and low-income (97%). The focus of the effort must instead lie in improving the environmental constraints that keep people in poverty and strengthening the enablers that can allow them to take charge of their own lives. Some of these enablers would include access to good healthcare and associated financial protection, basic financial services, good pre-school education and nutrition support services, and agricultural productivity services. However, strengthening these enablers, while eminently feasible, will not be easy.
Take healthcare for mothers and babies as an example. We know babies are more likely to survive when they receive essential newborn care – thermal care (drying and skin-to-skin contact), hygiene and infection control (cord-care and caregiver handwashing), and early and immediate breastfeeding. We also know that these practices are more likely in clinical settings than at home in low resource settings. When these practices are followed diligently, women can return to their homes healthier and better able to take care of themselves and their babies. It also allows their children to thrive and to grow up into strong adults who are able to successfully pursue efforts that will change their income status. Ensuring that all of this happens has therefore become a key focus of efforts in the healthcare sector.
An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women. A nine-state analysis of the effects of the yojana tells us the following: while inequality in access to care has reduced dramatically – in 2010, 49% of women on average were delivering at facilities, compared to 20% earlier – there still remains a large gap in accessing hospital-based delivery. The analysis reveals that nearly 70% of this could be attributed to differences in male literacy, disparities in access to emergency obstetric care and high levels of poverty. In Bihar, for instance, after an initial spurt in women giving birth in facilities and delivery rates improving from 19.9% in 2005-’06 to 63.8% in 2015-’16, growth has stagnated in recent years. In some districts, such as Bhojpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Munger, Patna and Rohtas, over 80% of women deliver in facilities, whereas in Darbhanga, East Champaran, Kishanganj and Sitamarhi, that figure is around 50%.
A key finding from a recent study that examined the effect of Ananya – a health system training and community outreach intervention on reproductive, maternal and newborn health care utilisation in Bihar – was the large effect of gender inequity, specifically child marriage, on limiting the impact of the programme. We also know that maternal education and maternal incomes have strong positive associations with several health and development results including infant mortality, nutrition and women’s reproductive agency. Efforts to further improve access to basic healthcare for mothers and babies, in addition to the yojana, would now need to address these additional sets of factors that research has revealed are acting as blockers to further progress.
India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty in the past two decades. The pace of poverty reduction has also accelerated over time: it was three times faster between 2005 and 2012 than in the previous decade. Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty. Moreover, as we look beyond a monetary assessment of progress to other dimensions of well-being – nutrition, education, employment – we see that while those indicators have improved, they have done so to a lesser extent than in other developing countries. For India’s future growth to be more equitable, as the healthcare example reveals, we will need to take into account myriad inter-connected and underlying factors. Fortunately, there are lessons that can be built upon, and in so doing, we can inch closer and closer towards an equitable India.
Source:- https://scroll.in/article/877142/india-is-a-grossly-unequal-country-and-it-shows-in-the-quality-of-healthcare-for-poor-mothers
...Read More
Which of the following summarizes paragraph 2 of the passage?

I. According to a study conducted by the Pew Research Center, India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011.
II. India is perhaps on the edge and will soon become a developed country because of the developments that are taking place. 
III. India saw a drastic change in the economic condition of the people belonging to low income groups after the poverty level fell.
IV. low-income India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% the people saw only a marginal increase which made them low-income earners from poor, while not actually appreciating their status.

Question 2

Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world after Russia, according to a 2017 Oxfam report entitled “An economy for the 99%”. More sobering is the fact that even the people we might consider to be middle class in India are really quite poor.
According to a study by Pew Research Center, even though India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011, the population that could be considered middle income saw only a marginal increase, going from about 1% to just 3%. This means instead of a swelling middle class, India saw a movement of its population from poor to low-income earners (defined as between Rs 34 and Rs 170 per day per person, or Rs 170 to Rs 850 per day per family). The study pointed out that “these were people hovering closer to $2 than $10 in daily income, and thus still a ways from the transition to middle-income status.” At that income threshold, a large proportion of Indians are at the edge of the global poverty line, possibly only one economic or health shock away from slipping back into poverty.
Given the sheer size of the problem, it would be infeasible for India to address it through transfers of wealth from the tiny sliver of high- and middle-income people (3% of the population) to the poor and low-income (97%). The focus of the effort must instead lie in improving the environmental constraints that keep people in poverty and strengthening the enablers that can allow them to take charge of their own lives. Some of these enablers would include access to good healthcare and associated financial protection, basic financial services, good pre-school education and nutrition support services, and agricultural productivity services. However, strengthening these enablers, while eminently feasible, will not be easy.
Take healthcare for mothers and babies as an example. We know babies are more likely to survive when they receive essential newborn care – thermal care (drying and skin-to-skin contact), hygiene and infection control (cord-care and caregiver handwashing), and early and immediate breastfeeding. We also know that these practices are more likely in clinical settings than at home in low resource settings. When these practices are followed diligently, women can return to their homes healthier and better able to take care of themselves and their babies. It also allows their children to thrive and to grow up into strong adults who are able to successfully pursue efforts that will change their income status. Ensuring that all of this happens has therefore become a key focus of efforts in the healthcare sector.
An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women. A nine-state analysis of the effects of the yojana tells us the following: while inequality in access to care has reduced dramatically – in 2010, 49% of women on average were delivering at facilities, compared to 20% earlier – there still remains a large gap in accessing hospital-based delivery. The analysis reveals that nearly 70% of this could be attributed to differences in male literacy, disparities in access to emergency obstetric care and high levels of poverty. In Bihar, for instance, after an initial spurt in women giving birth in facilities and delivery rates improving from 19.9% in 2005-’06 to 63.8% in 2015-’16, growth has stagnated in recent years. In some districts, such as Bhojpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Munger, Patna and Rohtas, over 80% of women deliver in facilities, whereas in Darbhanga, East Champaran, Kishanganj and Sitamarhi, that figure is around 50%.
A key finding from a recent study that examined the effect of Ananya – a health system training and community outreach intervention on reproductive, maternal and newborn health care utilisation in Bihar – was the large effect of gender inequity, specifically child marriage, on limiting the impact of the programme. We also know that maternal education and maternal incomes have strong positive associations with several health and development results including infant mortality, nutrition and women’s reproductive agency. Efforts to further improve access to basic healthcare for mothers and babies, in addition to the yojana, would now need to address these additional sets of factors that research has revealed are acting as blockers to further progress.
India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty in the past two decades. The pace of poverty reduction has also accelerated over time: it was three times faster between 2005 and 2012 than in the previous decade. Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty. Moreover, as we look beyond a monetary assessment of progress to other dimensions of well-being – nutrition, education, employment – we see that while those indicators have improved, they have done so to a lesser extent than in other developing countries. For India’s future growth to be more equitable, as the healthcare example reveals, we will need to take into account myriad inter-connected and underlying factors. Fortunately, there are lessons that can be built upon, and in so doing, we can inch closer and closer towards an equitable India.
Source:- https://scroll.in/article/877142/india-is-a-grossly-unequal-country-and-it-shows-in-the-quality-of-healthcare-for-poor-mothers
...Read More
Which of the following provides a contrast to the given statement(s):-
'An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women.’

Question 3

Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world after Russia, according to a 2017 Oxfam report entitled “An economy for the 99%”. More sobering is the fact that even the people we might consider to be middle class in India are really quite poor.
According to a study by Pew Research Center, even though India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011, the population that could be considered middle income saw only a marginal increase, going from about 1% to just 3%. This means instead of a swelling middle class, India saw a movement of its population from poor to low-income earners (defined as between Rs 34 and Rs 170 per day per person, or Rs 170 to Rs 850 per day per family). The study pointed out that “these were people hovering closer to $2 than $10 in daily income, and thus still a ways from the transition to middle-income status.” At that income threshold, a large proportion of Indians are at the edge of the global poverty line, possibly only one economic or health shock away from slipping back into poverty.
Given the sheer size of the problem, it would be infeasible for India to address it through transfers of wealth from the tiny sliver of high- and middle-income people (3% of the population) to the poor and low-income (97%). The focus of the effort must instead lie in improving the environmental constraints that keep people in poverty and strengthening the enablers that can allow them to take charge of their own lives. Some of these enablers would include access to good healthcare and associated financial protection, basic financial services, good pre-school education and nutrition support services, and agricultural productivity services. However, strengthening these enablers, while eminently feasible, will not be easy.
Take healthcare for mothers and babies as an example. We know babies are more likely to survive when they receive essential newborn care – thermal care (drying and skin-to-skin contact), hygiene and infection control (cord-care and caregiver handwashing), and early and immediate breastfeeding. We also know that these practices are more likely in clinical settings than at home in low resource settings. When these practices are followed diligently, women can return to their homes healthier and better able to take care of themselves and their babies. It also allows their children to thrive and to grow up into strong adults who are able to successfully pursue efforts that will change their income status. Ensuring that all of this happens has therefore become a key focus of efforts in the healthcare sector.
An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women. A nine-state analysis of the effects of the yojana tells us the following: while inequality in access to care has reduced dramatically – in 2010, 49% of women on average were delivering at facilities, compared to 20% earlier – there still remains a large gap in accessing hospital-based delivery. The analysis reveals that nearly 70% of this could be attributed to differences in male literacy, disparities in access to emergency obstetric care and high levels of poverty. In Bihar, for instance, after an initial spurt in women giving birth in facilities and delivery rates improving from 19.9% in 2005-’06 to 63.8% in 2015-’16, growth has stagnated in recent years. In some districts, such as Bhojpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Munger, Patna and Rohtas, over 80% of women deliver in facilities, whereas in Darbhanga, East Champaran, Kishanganj and Sitamarhi, that figure is around 50%.
A key finding from a recent study that examined the effect of Ananya – a health system training and community outreach intervention on reproductive, maternal and newborn health care utilisation in Bihar – was the large effect of gender inequity, specifically child marriage, on limiting the impact of the programme. We also know that maternal education and maternal incomes have strong positive associations with several health and development results including infant mortality, nutrition and women’s reproductive agency. Efforts to further improve access to basic healthcare for mothers and babies, in addition to the yojana, would now need to address these additional sets of factors that research has revealed are acting as blockers to further progress.
India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty in the past two decades. The pace of poverty reduction has also accelerated over time: it was three times faster between 2005 and 2012 than in the previous decade. Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty. Moreover, as we look beyond a monetary assessment of progress to other dimensions of well-being – nutrition, education, employment – we see that while those indicators have improved, they have done so to a lesser extent than in other developing countries. For India’s future growth to be more equitable, as the healthcare example reveals, we will need to take into account myriad inter-connected and underlying factors. Fortunately, there are lessons that can be built upon, and in so doing, we can inch closer and closer towards an equitable India.
Source:- https://scroll.in/article/877142/india-is-a-grossly-unequal-country-and-it-shows-in-the-quality-of-healthcare-for-poor-mothers
...Read More
The author talks about the ‘additional sets of factors’. What are the basic factors that are being referred to in the context?

Question 4

Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world after Russia, according to a 2017 Oxfam report entitled “An economy for the 99%”. More sobering is the fact that even the people we might consider to be middle class in India are really quite poor.
According to a study by Pew Research Center, even though India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011, the population that could be considered middle income saw only a marginal increase, going from about 1% to just 3%. This means instead of a swelling middle class, India saw a movement of its population from poor to low-income earners (defined as between Rs 34 and Rs 170 per day per person, or Rs 170 to Rs 850 per day per family). The study pointed out that “these were people hovering closer to $2 than $10 in daily income, and thus still a ways from the transition to middle-income status.” At that income threshold, a large proportion of Indians are at the edge of the global poverty line, possibly only one economic or health shock away from slipping back into poverty.
Given the sheer size of the problem, it would be infeasible for India to address it through transfers of wealth from the tiny sliver of high- and middle-income people (3% of the population) to the poor and low-income (97%). The focus of the effort must instead lie in improving the environmental constraints that keep people in poverty and strengthening the enablers that can allow them to take charge of their own lives. Some of these enablers would include access to good healthcare and associated financial protection, basic financial services, good pre-school education and nutrition support services, and agricultural productivity services. However, strengthening these enablers, while eminently feasible, will not be easy.
Take healthcare for mothers and babies as an example. We know babies are more likely to survive when they receive essential newborn care – thermal care (drying and skin-to-skin contact), hygiene and infection control (cord-care and caregiver handwashing), and early and immediate breastfeeding. We also know that these practices are more likely in clinical settings than at home in low resource settings. When these practices are followed diligently, women can return to their homes healthier and better able to take care of themselves and their babies. It also allows their children to thrive and to grow up into strong adults who are able to successfully pursue efforts that will change their income status. Ensuring that all of this happens has therefore become a key focus of efforts in the healthcare sector.
An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women. A nine-state analysis of the effects of the yojana tells us the following: while inequality in access to care has reduced dramatically – in 2010, 49% of women on average were delivering at facilities, compared to 20% earlier – there still remains a large gap in accessing hospital-based delivery. The analysis reveals that nearly 70% of this could be attributed to differences in male literacy, disparities in access to emergency obstetric care and high levels of poverty. In Bihar, for instance, after an initial spurt in women giving birth in facilities and delivery rates improving from 19.9% in 2005-’06 to 63.8% in 2015-’16, growth has stagnated in recent years. In some districts, such as Bhojpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Munger, Patna and Rohtas, over 80% of women deliver in facilities, whereas in Darbhanga, East Champaran, Kishanganj and Sitamarhi, that figure is around 50%.
A key finding from a recent study that examined the effect of Ananya – a health system training and community outreach intervention on reproductive, maternal and newborn health care utilisation in Bihar – was the large effect of gender inequity, specifically child marriage, on limiting the impact of the programme. We also know that maternal education and maternal incomes have strong positive associations with several health and development results including infant mortality, nutrition and women’s reproductive agency. Efforts to further improve access to basic healthcare for mothers and babies, in addition to the yojana, would now need to address these additional sets of factors that research has revealed are acting as blockers to further progress.
India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty in the past two decades. The pace of poverty reduction has also accelerated over time: it was three times faster between 2005 and 2012 than in the previous decade. Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty. Moreover, as we look beyond a monetary assessment of progress to other dimensions of well-being – nutrition, education, employment – we see that while those indicators have improved, they have done so to a lesser extent than in other developing countries. For India’s future growth to be more equitable, as the healthcare example reveals, we will need to take into account myriad inter-connected and underlying factors. Fortunately, there are lessons that can be built upon, and in so doing, we can inch closer and closer towards an equitable India.
Source:- https://scroll.in/article/877142/india-is-a-grossly-unequal-country-and-it-shows-in-the-quality-of-healthcare-for-poor-mothers
...Read More
Which of the following summarizes paragraph 3 of the passage?
I. India will be able to address the problem through a transfer of wealth from high and middle income people to low and poor income people.
II. Suppression posed by the environment keeps people in poverty and prohibits them to take charge of their own lives.
III. Lack of equipping factors like good health care and associated financial protection, basic financial services, etc. keep people in poverty. Availing the access of these to the poor can solve the problem.
IV. Giving access to certain facilities and advantages though feasible will be difficult to provide.

Question 5

Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world after Russia, according to a 2017 Oxfam report entitled “An economy for the 99%”. More sobering is the fact that even the people we might consider to be middle class in India are really quite poor.
According to a study by Pew Research Center, even though India’s poverty rate fell from 35% in 2001 to 20% in 2011, the population that could be considered middle income saw only a marginal increase, going from about 1% to just 3%. This means instead of a swelling middle class, India saw a movement of its population from poor to low-income earners (defined as between Rs 34 and Rs 170 per day per person, or Rs 170 to Rs 850 per day per family). The study pointed out that “these were people hovering closer to $2 than $10 in daily income, and thus still a ways from the transition to middle-income status.” At that income threshold, a large proportion of Indians are at the edge of the global poverty line, possibly only one economic or health shock away from slipping back into poverty.
Given the sheer size of the problem, it would be infeasible for India to address it through transfers of wealth from the tiny sliver of high- and middle-income people (3% of the population) to the poor and low-income (97%). The focus of the effort must instead lie in improving the environmental constraints that keep people in poverty and strengthening the enablers that can allow them to take charge of their own lives. Some of these enablers would include access to good healthcare and associated financial protection, basic financial services, good pre-school education and nutrition support services, and agricultural productivity services. However, strengthening these enablers, while eminently feasible, will not be easy.
Take healthcare for mothers and babies as an example. We know babies are more likely to survive when they receive essential newborn care – thermal care (drying and skin-to-skin contact), hygiene and infection control (cord-care and caregiver handwashing), and early and immediate breastfeeding. We also know that these practices are more likely in clinical settings than at home in low resource settings. When these practices are followed diligently, women can return to their homes healthier and better able to take care of themselves and their babies. It also allows their children to thrive and to grow up into strong adults who are able to successfully pursue efforts that will change their income status. Ensuring that all of this happens has therefore become a key focus of efforts in the healthcare sector.
An example of this is the Janani Suraksha Yojana, a government-run conditional cash transfer programme launched in 2005-’06 to persuade women to deliver their babies in hospital settings. In the decade since it was launched, it has significantly improved the rate of hospital deliveries among rural women. A nine-state analysis of the effects of the yojana tells us the following: while inequality in access to care has reduced dramatically – in 2010, 49% of women on average were delivering at facilities, compared to 20% earlier – there still remains a large gap in accessing hospital-based delivery. The analysis reveals that nearly 70% of this could be attributed to differences in male literacy, disparities in access to emergency obstetric care and high levels of poverty. In Bihar, for instance, after an initial spurt in women giving birth in facilities and delivery rates improving from 19.9% in 2005-’06 to 63.8% in 2015-’16, growth has stagnated in recent years. In some districts, such as Bhojpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Munger, Patna and Rohtas, over 80% of women deliver in facilities, whereas in Darbhanga, East Champaran, Kishanganj and Sitamarhi, that figure is around 50%.
A key finding from a recent study that examined the effect of Ananya – a health system training and community outreach intervention on reproductive, maternal and newborn health care utilisation in Bihar – was the large effect of gender inequity, specifically child marriage, on limiting the impact of the programme. We also know that maternal education and maternal incomes have strong positive associations with several health and development results including infant mortality, nutrition and women’s reproductive agency. Efforts to further improve access to basic healthcare for mothers and babies, in addition to the yojana, would now need to address these additional sets of factors that research has revealed are acting as blockers to further progress.
India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty in the past two decades. The pace of poverty reduction has also accelerated over time: it was three times faster between 2005 and 2012 than in the previous decade. Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty. Moreover, as we look beyond a monetary assessment of progress to other dimensions of well-being – nutrition, education, employment – we see that while those indicators have improved, they have done so to a lesser extent than in other developing countries. For India’s future growth to be more equitable, as the healthcare example reveals, we will need to take into account myriad inter-connected and underlying factors. Fortunately, there are lessons that can be built upon, and in so doing, we can inch closer and closer towards an equitable India.
Source:- https://scroll.in/article/877142/india-is-a-grossly-unequal-country-and-it-shows-in-the-quality-of-healthcare-for-poor-mothers
...Read More
Which of the following provides a contrast to the given statement(s):-
‘Despite this, and despite India’s promising economic growth, 97%of the country would still be considered poor or low-income by global standards of poverty.’

I. Nutrition, education, employment have improved to a lesser extent than other developing countries.
II. Myriad inter-connected and underlying factors when taken into consideration will help in making India’s future growth to be more equitable.
III. On the global scale, India has made tremendous progress in reducing absolute poverty.
IV. Various lessons have been learnt by India, and the days are not far when we will have India which provides equitable opportunities to all.
  • 571 attempts
  • 1 upvote
  • 0 comments
Apr 16PO, Clerk, SO, Insurance

Posted by:

Sheetal GoyalSheetal GoyalMember since Jan 2020
Academic counselor helping students to prepare for Bank and insurance exams.
Share this quiz   |