Time Left - 15:00 mins
Attempt now to get your rank among 1608 students!
Question 1
Which of the following countries will host the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations?
Question 2
Who has been appointed as the Chief Economist in International Monetary Fund (IMF)?
Question 3
Which of the following ministry has launched ‘Swachh Survekshan 2019’ to evaluate the achievements in the cleanliness level in urban areas of the country?
Question 4
Veteran actor C H Lokanath passed away recently. He belonged to______.
Question 5
Who has been named as the International Cricket Council (ICC) Women’s Cricketer of the Year?
Question 6
Direction: In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered. These numbers are printed below the pas-sage and against each, five words/phrases are suggested, one of which fits the blank appropriately.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Find out the appropriate word in each case.
Question 7
Direction: In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered. These numbers are printed below the pas-sage and against each, five words/phrases are suggested, one of which fits the blank appropriately.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Find out the appropriate word in each case.
Question 8
Direction: In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered. These numbers are printed below the pas-sage and against each, five words/phrases are suggested, one of which fits the blank appropriately.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Find out the appropriate word in each case.
Question 9
Direction: In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered. These numbers are printed below the pas-sage and against each, five words/phrases are suggested, one of which fits the blank appropriately.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Find out the appropriate word in each case.
Question 10
Direction: In the following passage there are blanks each of which has been numbered. These numbers are printed below the pas-sage and against each, five words/phrases are suggested, one of which fits the blank appropriately.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Muslim Personal Law is already modern in the sense, that it has enshrined the individual rights to property since the 1930s, unlike Hindu law, in which the family’s natural condition is (6) to be “joint”. In the decades of the 1930s and 1940s, contrary to later discourses about Muslim law being 'backward', it was the Hindu law that was (7) “backward” and needed to be brought into the modern world of individual property rights. Also, the Muslim marriage as a contract protects women better in case of a divorce than the Hindu marriages. All marriages are considered as a (8), along with being a civil contract. Mehr, in Muslim Personal Law, is paid by the husband’s family to the wife upon marriage, is the (9) property of the wife and it is hers upon divorce, offering her a protection thereafter which Hindu women do not have. So, it is plausible that the Uniform Civil Code would make the practice of 'mehr' compulsory for all while abolishing dowry.
It is absurd to think that a “Uniform Civil Code” has nothing to do with gender justice. Nevertheless, it also has a Hindu nationalist agenda along with the cult of the 'beef-ban' and the construction of the Ayodhya temple. A Uniform Civil Code in this sense of the term is meant to (10) Muslims, teach them (if they didn’t know it already) that they are second-class citizens, and that they live at the mercy of “the national race” (the Hindus), as M.S. Golwalkar decreed.
Find out the appropriate word in each case.
Question 11
Ram is twice as fast as Aman and Aman is thrice as fast as Rohit in doing a work. Working together they can finish the work in 10 days. In how many days can Aman and Rohit together finish the work.
Question 12
Karu gave 40% of the amount to Goru. Goru gave one-fourth of what he received from Karu to papu. After paying Rs200 to the taxi driver out of the amount he got from Goru, Papu is now left with Rs600. How much amount did Karu have?
Question 13
Two pipes p1 and p2 can fill a tank in 40 minutes and 60 minutes respectively. Both the taps are opened and after 10 minutes p1 was shut. In how much more time (in minutes) would the tank be full?
Question 14
Piyush invested 20%more than Arun. Arun invested 10%less than Akshay. If the total sum of their investment is Rs. 35760 how much amount did Akashy invest?
Question 15
Find out the speed of the Rajdhani Express is by what percentage more than the speed of the Mahaparinirvan Express if the two trains cross each other in 17 sec when they are moving in opposite direction, and in 4 min 15 sec when they are moving in the same direction.
Question 16
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
Seven persons, P, Q, R, S, T, U and V works in different International Organizations- WHO, WTO, OPEC, NASA, ILO, WB and UN not necessarily in the same order. Each person belongs to different countries- US, UK, Canada, Russia, France, Japan and China again not necessarily in the same order.
U belongs to US and works neither OPEC nor NASA. The one who works with WHO belongs to UK. P works with WTO and belongs to neither Russia nor France. The one who works with UN belongs to China. Q belongs to Japan and does not work with NASA. The one who works with NASA does not belong to France. S works with ILO. V does not belong to UK and does not work with NASA. T does not work with NASA.
U belongs to US and works neither OPEC nor NASA. The one who works with WHO belongs to UK. P works with WTO and belongs to neither Russia nor France. The one who works with UN belongs to China. Q belongs to Japan and does not work with NASA. The one who works with NASA does not belong to France. S works with ILO. V does not belong to UK and does not work with NASA. T does not work with NASA.
Which of the following is not correct?
Question 17
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Who among the following sit at the extreme ends?
Question 18
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Who sits third to the left of F?
Question 19
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Who among the following is sitting between G and K?
Question 20
Direction: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
Four girls I, J, K and L and four boys E, F, G and H are sitting in a single row facing north. Three boys are sitting between two girls and the only boy who is not among those boys is sitting at one of the extreme ends. H is sitting fourth to the left of L. Both J and K are sitting beside a boy. J is not the immediate neighbour of L. J doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. G is sitting between H and F. L doesn't sit at any of the extreme ends. Not more than two girls are sitting together.
How many girls are sitting to the right of K?
- 1608 attempts
- 13 upvotes
- 27 comments
Dec 20PO, Clerk, SO, Insurance
