Time Left - 16:00 mins
Attempt now to get your rank among 1441 students!
Question 1
Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Which of the following statements is definitely FALSE in the context of the existing provisions of the NGT?
Question 2
Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Which of the following does not fall into the ambit of the NGT?
Question 3
Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Which of the following can be one of the implications of the change brought up by the Financial Act, 2017 on the NGT?
(i) Depriving it of its autonomy
(ii) Interference of the government in its proceedings
(iii) Poor quality of the rulings
(i) Depriving it of its autonomy
(ii) Interference of the government in its proceedings
(iii) Poor quality of the rulings
Question 4
Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
It can be inferred from the passage that-
(i) the NGT has been functioning independently for the cause of the environment protection
(ii) the change in the qualifications and service conditions of the NGT members have been introduced by the government to dilute its power
(iii) the changes introduced by the Financial Act, 2017 may result in biased rulings
(i) the NGT has been functioning independently for the cause of the environment protection
(ii) the change in the qualifications and service conditions of the NGT members have been introduced by the government to dilute its power
(iii) the changes introduced by the Financial Act, 2017 may result in biased rulings
Question 5
Direction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
Given the pace at which the Narendra Modi government is moving to either capture or defang institutions that come in the way of its larger political, social and economic agenda, it is hardly a surprise that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is also in the line of fire. Set up under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, its remit is to deal with all cases that relate to protecting the environment, conserving forests and natural resources, enforcing legal rights relating to the environment, and giving compensation and relief to people who have suffered damage to their property due to environmental damage. It was set up specifically so that environmental cases could be dealt with speedily and with the requisite expertise. Only the Supreme Court can reverse its ruling. So, for a government in a hurry to implement its developmental model, a “green” court that can take independent decisions on environmental concerns is an uncomfortable presence.
Within months of the Modi government taking office in May 2014, there was talk in government corridors that steps would be taken to rein in the powers of the NGT. While there has been no direct move to dilute the NGT Act, changes brought about by way of the Finance Act, 2017 do precisely that. This law now has provisions applying to tribunals that will also apply to the NGT. An important change brought about by the Finance Act, 2017 is in the qualifications and service conditions of members of tribunals like the NGT. Thus, while under existing provisions the NGT chairperson has to be a retired or serving Supreme Court judge or the chief justice of a high court—in other words, a person with experience in judicial matters—under the new rules, anyone who is qualified to be a Supreme Court judge can head the tribunal. So, even a lawyer with 10 years’ experience in a high court, who is technically qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, can be selected to head the NGT. Also, while currently, the NGT chooses its members through a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, in future, the choice would be left to government officials. The long-term fallout of these changes would be felt in the quality of the rulings of the NGT, which would be deprived of the judicial experience of senior judges, and would also compromise its independence; something that is essential given that it often has to judge the actions of governments, both at the centre and in the states.
Source: https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/29/editorials/importance-being-independent.html
The author feels that the provisions related to Financial Act, 2017 will render the NGT ineffective because they will-
(i) limit its adjudication area
(ii) deprive the NGT of its judiciary powers
(iii) indirectly dilute the NGT Act
(i) limit its adjudication area
(ii) deprive the NGT of its judiciary powers
(iii) indirectly dilute the NGT Act
Question 6
Direction: Study the following pie - charts carefully and answer the question that follow:
Percentage Break – up of the Students studying in different Classes of a School.
Percentage Break – up of boys in each Class of the School.
Percentage Break - up of students who recently got promoted in each Class of the School.
If half of the number of students, who got promoted from Class 12 were Boys. What was the approximate percentage of Boys who got promoted from Class 12 out of the total number of boys in class 12?
Question 7
Direction: Study the following pie - charts carefully and answer the question that follow:
Percentage Break – up of the Students studying in different Classes of a School.
Percentage Break – up of boys in each Class of the School.
Percentage Break - up of students who recently got promoted in each Class of the School.
What is the sum of the number of girls studying in class 8 and 10 together?
Question 8
Direction: Study the following pie - charts carefully and answer the question that follow:
Percentage Break – up of the Students studying in different Classes of a School.
Percentage Break – up of boys in each Class of the School.
Percentage Break - up of students who recently got promoted in each Class of the School.
How many girls were studying in Class 9?
Question 9
Direction: Study the following pie - charts carefully and answer the question that follow:
Percentage Break – up of the Students studying in different Classes of a School.
Percentage Break – up of boys in each Class of the School.
Percentage Break - up of students who recently got promoted in each Class of the School.
Total number of students who got promoted from all classes together was what percent of the total number of students(approx.) studying in the organization together?
Question 10
Direction: Study the following pie - charts carefully and answer the question that follow:
Percentage Break – up of the Students studying in different Classes of a School.
Percentage Break – up of boys in each Class of the School.
Percentage Break - up of students who recently got promoted in each Class of the School.
The number of students who got promoted from class 11 is what percentage of the total number of student studying in that class?
Question 11
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
What is the code for ‘India’ in the given code language?
Question 12
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
What is the code for ‘enjoy clean environment' in the given code language?
Question 13
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
What does ‘ma’ stand for?
Question 14
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
What is the code for ‘places’ in the given code language?
Question 15
Direction: Study the information given below and answer the questions based on it.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
In a certain language,
‘enjoy the places of India’ is written as ‘pi da ni ea ba’,
‘neat and clean places’ is written as ‘ri la ma da’,
‘India is clean country’ is written as ‘ki la sa ea’,
‘enjoy the neat environment is written as ‘ba ma pi zi’.
‘da ma’ is the code for which of the following?
Question 16
Which of the following cities has received the India’s “Cleanest Big City” in Swachh Survekshan 2019 (SS 2019) awards?
Question 17
Which of the following mobile apps has been launched by the ‘Google’ to help children in primary school learn to read in Hindi and English?
Question 18
Who has been appointed as the non-executive Chairman of Bank of Baroda (BoB)?
Question 19
Who won the 2019 Pritzker Architecture Prize?
Question 20
Indian player Lalremsiami is related to which of the following sports?
- 1441 attempts
- 6 upvotes
- 17 comments
Jan 19PO, Clerk, SO, Insurance
